(no subject)
Nov. 16th, 2009 12:29 pmAlright, something is bothering me from "The Waters of Mars." All my science peeps, get in here.
When the base is blowing up, I understand why there'd be explosions- plenty of fuel and stored oxygen from the life support systems. That's cool. But AFTER that, when Ten's standing in the flames contemplating his own mortality and the rules of time and if he should get help and if he remembered to call in a refill on his psychiatric medication because the voices are back again, WHY IS HE STILL STANDING IN THE FLAMES??
If I remember correctly, fire needs an ignition source (the rocket), fuel (from the shuttle, and the splodey bits of the base, and OXYGEN. There was some, yes, but I'm sure that would have burned up fairly quickly, and there are only trace bits of oxygen in Mars' atmosphere, it's mostly CO2.
I'm thinknig about this too hard, aren't I? They probably just went DAVID TENNANT LOOKS SEXY AND DANGEROUS IN FLAMES: PRODUCTION TEAM, GET ON THAT! and that was it. But still.
When the base is blowing up, I understand why there'd be explosions- plenty of fuel and stored oxygen from the life support systems. That's cool. But AFTER that, when Ten's standing in the flames contemplating his own mortality and the rules of time and if he should get help and if he remembered to call in a refill on his psychiatric medication because the voices are back again, WHY IS HE STILL STANDING IN THE FLAMES??
If I remember correctly, fire needs an ignition source (the rocket), fuel (from the shuttle, and the splodey bits of the base, and OXYGEN. There was some, yes, but I'm sure that would have burned up fairly quickly, and there are only trace bits of oxygen in Mars' atmosphere, it's mostly CO2.
I'm thinknig about this too hard, aren't I? They probably just went DAVID TENNANT LOOKS SEXY AND DANGEROUS IN FLAMES: PRODUCTION TEAM, GET ON THAT! and that was it. But still.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 05:35 pm (UTC)I haven't watched it yet, though! I realized that I never even finished the Easter special, and uh, watched Seeker instead. :D
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 05:36 pm (UTC)But really, I have no idea if you could get fire using something other than oxygen. I'd almost think so, but I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 06:26 pm (UTC)Which is complete handwavey crap, because I don't know of anything that man's discovered or invented that does such a thing, but I imagine it'd be something we'd have to work on for serious longterm space travel projects.
And here we go: among the other known oxidizing elements, at least fluorine is capable of sustaining fire, and would pretty much only be used as a fuel element in longterm/deep space projects because there is currently no method known to man of putting out a fluorine fire!
http://yarchive.net/space/rocket/fuels/fluorine.html
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 09:45 pm (UTC)(Forgive any glaring ignorance I display. It has been about seven years since my last serious foray into chemistry.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:25 pm (UTC)I think that was entirely the reasoning, and I was so busy agreeing that I totally missed the science. WELL PLAYED, DW TEAM.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:32 pm (UTC)...though in terms of imagry I was mostly searchign for Rose's lip prints on his helmet. *ducks*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:34 pm (UTC)...I have a proven track record of not seeing the forest for the trees.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 07:01 pm (UTC)Usually I'm all for scientific accuracy but...it's Doctor Who! My handwaving capability goes up 100x.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:36 pm (UTC)