intrikate88: (Default)
Am back from vacation. Am exhausted. Am thinking of laundry sitting all night in dryer getting wrinkly because I was too tired to deal with it. Am marathoning Big Bang Theory just because, and I need good icons for it, because now I have more icon space.

Am really glad it’s Friday and I can maybe sleep all weekend. Not really. But it’s a nice thought.

As you know, I’m editing for a medical journal these days, so I’m using my office time and work resources responsibly by giggling over letters to the editor that use phrases like OVER TEN THOUSAND HUMAN SKELETONS, as well as using PubMed's Citation Matcher from the NIH library to look up articles Alex Drake would have been searching to use as references for any articles she might write on Sam Tyler’s case. I’ve determined the best journal to attempt to publish such a report in would be Neurocase: case studies in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and behavioural neurology, since it features individual case studies and Alex would have a difficult time putting together a cohort of patients and healthy controls to more specifically examine the occurrence of going back in time when hit by a car.

Or getting such a study approved of by local ethics committees and the Declaration of Helsinki. Still, I’d like to see that table of values.

Abstracts like this are fun:
 
Neurocase. 2010 Apr 15:1-10. [Epub ahead of print]
Bilateral hippocampal lesion and a selective impairment of the ability for mental time travel.
Andelman F, Hoofien D, Goldberg I, Aizenstein O, Neufeld MY.
Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
Mental time travel allows individuals to mentally project themselves backwards and forwards in subjective time. This case report describes a young woman suddenly rendered amnesic as a result of bilateral hippocampal damage following an epileptic seizure and brain anoxia. Her neuropsychological profile was characterized by a high-average general level of cognitive functioning, selective deficit in episodic memory of past events and a significant difficulty to envisage her personal future. This case provides clinical support for the concept of mental time travel with its retrospective and prospective components and for the hippocampus being its critical neural substrate.
 
I can’t imagine how frustrating it would be to study all this stuff on subjective time, traumatic brain injury, psychosis and depression in the recovery from traumatic brain injury, etc., and then get shot in the head and wind up right in the middle of it without any of your notes. I mean, damn, I’d be hysteric, trying to recompile everything.

Okay, back to work.
 
PS it is totally not crazy to go beyond mere fanfic and do actual research for papers by fictional characters right? RIGHT! I would also read Sheldon Cooper’s publications, though I suspect I would like Leonard’s more. And Leslie Winkler’s better than both of them. (I took her side in the string-theory debate when she broke up with Leonard.)

intrikate88: (Default)
I downloaded the Richard Feynman lectures on physics from the Six Easy Pieces selections (and several others, it was a giant folder, I don't remember everything, if you want them I can upload) and was listening to the first one on atoms and their movement on the drive to and from work today (I've got an hour commute each way, I have to make it productive somehow.)

I've always loved physics, and the weirder it gets, the better. But even the physics of the everyday is so simple and fascinating; I was working on my car tonight, and just knowing how a lever and circular motion can be used to lift an entire car with a minimum of effort is really quite amazing. Or knowing the chemical reactions that cause an engine to be more than a lump of metal. Or knowing about how hydraulic pressure controls a brake line.  It's all cool, all stuff I like to know about.

Feynman was talking in the lecture about how physicists discover laws in a way that's different from chemists or biologists... they have to come up with ideas first, about how things work, and those ideas, if they are good, are shown to be accurate through the observation of phenomena in repeated examples. It's not a theory or science without those experiments, but that idea, the imagination of it comes first. Feynman gave the example of hypothesizing about the structure of molecules and how those ideas could be proven by chemical experiments, and later by electron microscopes.

I was thinking more of how Einstein discovered all the things he did- it all started with thought experiments, with a giant WHAT IF. What if you were moving at the speed of light... and you looked in a mirror. What if you were moving upwards in an elevator really fast and somebody shone a light in one side. What if you were moving at 99% of the speed of light and your fellow traveler was moving at 95%, how would you each experience time?

And it occurred to me that in some ways, physicists and fic writers aren't that different. When you write fanfiction, you look at that world you're writing about, and you say... what if? What if we saw what Rose did after she was left in the other universe? What if Donna somehow met Gene Hunt? What if Susan used the skills she learned while ruling Narnia in this world, during the war? And so we write out these situations, seeing if they stand up to the way the characters really behave, and if they account for the laws that govern the internal logic of these worlds.

Sometimes they're bad ideas. Sometimes the way we've imagined them doesn't work, the characters just don't fit into those situations and so the fic falls apart, or maybe we just get no reviews or everybody goes "eh, that wasn't plausible". But sometimes they're great ideas. When people read the fics, they get a better idea of the motivations guiding that character, they find it consistent: a theory of behavior has been set forth and the situational evidence observed confirms that the original idea is more than just imagination, it's a legitimate predictor of further behaviors. The theory settles in people's heads and becomes something that guides their understanding of how the world works, whether that be how an atom is going to jiggle (Feynman's technical term!) or how Amy sees Rory.

I think that, in the end, that need to go "hey, what if..." is what really defines my interest in probably everything, making it a little less odd that I love literature and fandom and also physics, interests which have greatly confused people who think those can't go together (or, alternatively, have made people pretty much fall in love with me, which is a bit odder).

So that is how a raven is like a writing desk a fic-writer is like a physicist.

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 27th, 2026 01:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios